Introduction to the threat of Islam in Britain
This blog has been set up in order to further a true understanding of Islam and the Quran, from a non-Islamic perspective.
Whilst there are many verses in the Quran that are very praiseworthy, and mild-mannered, there are also numerous verses that do not fit well with a democratic, tolerant western culture, such as that prevalent in Britain.
It is necessary for the mainstream British subjects to fully understand that whilst it is possible for there to exist moderate Muslims, the Quran and Islam are very far from being moderate. In order to be moderate, such Muslims are obliged to ignore large numbers of verses in the Quran. Hence, the traditional, or "radicalised" Muslims will view the moderates as apostates or heretics, which, strictly, they are.
A number of cartoons have been produced, and are freely available for you to use, or to email them or put them on your own website or blog. I would also appreciate it if you would create a link from your website to this blog.
The cartoons quote from the Quran itself. The intolerant, homophobic, sexist and racist attitudes that they show are very far from my own views. I quote directly from the Quran in order to demonstrate how it is completely incompatible with modern western values.
In Britain we have a very long history of democratic priciples, and freedom of speech. These stretch back from their earliest beginnings at Runnymead, with the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215.
"Magna Carta is the greatest constitutional document of all times - the foundation of the freedom of the individual against the arbitrary authority of the despot." Lord Denning, Master of the Rolls 1965.
Unfortunately, we see in Britain today that our ancient freedoms and liberties have been seriously eroded. Freedom of expression has been significantly compromised, which very greatly affects our ability to tackle the dangerous and very evident threat that traditional Islam represents. We see that the freedom of the individual has been compromised.
If any moderate Muslim is reading this message, I would urge you to examine the difficult verses of the Quran. Would Allah really wish you to slaughter everyone who does not believe? There must surely have been some terrible mistake.
If you find these cartoons offensive, then so be it. They are not gratuitously so, as other cartoons may be. However, nobody was ever killed by a cartoon. Many innocent civilians have been killed and seriously injured by Islamic bombs, and by passenger planes used as weapons. The whole of humanity is offended by such acts committed in the name of Islam.
Prince Charles has made no secret of his support for Islam. Whilst I am a loyal subject, and support very much the Royal Family, and the values and traditions that it upholds, I feel that he is badly misguided in this respect. Does he not realise, that under Sharia law, as an adulterer he would have been stoned to death by now?
These are sufficient words for now. Please enjoy the cartoons, and feel free to use them in your own publication, website, or blog. There is no copyright on the truth.
Humanity needs peace not Islam.
posted by Lionheart @ 8:23 pm
4 comments
4 Comments:
Yes, indeed. Islam poses a genuine threat to British culture and customs.
Many Muslims, peaceful and tolerant as individuals, are corrupted by their religion to a greater or lesser extent. 'Secular' Muslims honestly do try to live in peace and harmony whilst still retaining a dormant link with the culture of their ancestors.
YouGov pollsters discovered that a whopping 94% of 'British' Muslims are not wholly loyal to the Crown. Over 1/3 proclaimed an OVERT support of terrorists or their champions.
Their religion is akin to Nazism. Islam, too, is a theocratic institution for example (that means cult and state are merged). Islam also promotes a kind-of racial supremacy, constant battle-readiness of the entire mass of believers, wholesale genocide of Jews without any quarter given and a brutal 'might is right' attitude. No wonder there are riots as soon as any public figure dares to highlight the negative aspects of such a cruel doctrine.
And to top it all off, Muslims have their own long-dead Fuhrer, their own Mein Kampf (Koran), their own glorified histories (Hadith) manifesto (Sunnah), their own paramiltary training camps, their own slogans and their own spies and fifth-columns
and latter-day Quislings to help them take over Western territories by stealth or force.
(In one or two ways Nazism was better than Islam - for example Hitler banned the kosher/halal method of animal slaughter for being too cruel!)
"But Christianity contains bloodthirsty and hair-raising passages too."
Yes, but unlike Islam, Christianity's 'top brass' instigate regular revisions to 'de-nastify' it. The ball really started during the Renaissance and has been on-going to this day.
The Muslims have yet to start revising their religion.
And whilst Christianity promotes peace, tolerance, protection for the meek and rewards for the righteous, Islam works instead on the basis of the stronger dominating the weaker with punishments for anybody who does not submit blindly the doctrine of Allah. (Did Hitler know of Islam?!! He certainly knew of Islam's 'ideal' qualities and let many Muslims into the German Army to butcher the Slavs as a result!)
Sad to say that Islam can't be moderated or have the nasty bits cut out. Unlike Judiasm or Christianity, wickedness is at the core of Islam. And when the Hadith reveals that Muhammed was possessed by devils all his life, then it is impossible to consider how Islam could have been any different.
The only way forward is to tell the divisive Muslim Council Of Britain to officially define Islam as a doctrine of Peace, to re-write the Koran to have it interpreted as peaceful (WH Smith sell that already!) and excommunicate evil Muslims who preach hate and death. Muslims must also swear an oath to the Crown and be officially tried for treason should they be found guilty of terror plotting. This would mean that a controlled British state-sanctioned Islam would be the only legal flavour of Islam in which Muslims could believe. And if moderate Muslims are indeed what they claim, then they would not notice any difference.
In short, as another recent study found, Muslims who are made to toe the line and integrate with a host nation's culture can and do settle peacefully and turn their backs on the bombers.
But it takes a government with guts to get the ball rolling. But as Labour are desperate for the Muslim block-vote (due partly to proper Brits being so thoroughly disgusted with them) and the Tories are Labour wannabes, then it is clear that our troubles will get worse before they improve.
CLARIFICATION: It may appear in the above that I am suggesting a moderation of Islam in the paragraph imediately after the ne in which I said it was impossible!
What I should have made clear is that the intention is to have the State direct Islam and not the other way around.
Such a practice of Sovereign-sanctioned religion does of course have its precedents in British History.
Such a practice would have many benefits, not least in which governments, democratic organisations and Muslim public opinion of the day would shape the moral direction of the religion rather than the printed hear-say based on the diatribe of a brutal dictator the ancient world had the misfortune to experience.
Yes, indeed. Islam poses a genuine threat to British culture and customs.
Many Muslims, peaceful and tolerant as individuals, are corrupted by their religion to a greater or lesser extent. 'Secular' Muslims honestly do try to live in peace and harmony whilst still retaining a dormant link with the culture of their ancestors.
YouGov pollsters discovered that a whopping 94% of 'British' Muslims are not wholly loyal to the Crown. Over 1/3 proclaimed an OVERT support of terrorists or their champions.
Their religion is akin to Nazism. Islam, too, is a theocratic institution for example (that means cult and state are merged). Islam also promotes a kind-of racial supremacy, constant battle-readiness of the entire mass of believers, wholesale genocide of Jews without any quarter given and a brutal 'might is right' attitude. No wonder there are riots as soon as any public figure dares to highlight the negative aspects of such a cruel doctrine.
And to top it all off, Muslims have their own long-dead Fuhrer, their own Mein Kampf (Koran), their own glorified histories (Hadith) manifesto (Sunnah), their own paramiltary training camps, their own slogans and their own spies and fifth-columns
and latter-day Quislings to help them take over Western territories by stealth or force.
(In one or two ways Nazism was better than Islam - for example Hitler banned the kosher/halal method of animal slaughter for being too cruel!)
"But Christianity contains bloodthirsty and hair-raising passages too."
Yes, but unlike Islam, Christianity's 'top brass' instigate regular revisions to 'de-nastify' it. The ball really started during the Renaissance and has been on-going to this day.
The Muslims have yet to start revising their religion.
And whilst Christianity promotes peace, tolerance, protection for the meek and rewards for the righteous, Islam works instead on the basis of the stronger dominating the weaker with punishments for anybody who does not submit blindly the doctrine of Allah. (Did Hitler know of Islam?!! He certainly knew of Islam's 'ideal' qualities and let many Muslims into the German Army to butcher the Slavs as a result!)
Sad to say that Islam can't be moderated or have the nasty bits cut out. Unlike Judiasm or Christianity, wickedness is at the core of Islam. And when the Hadith reveals that Muhammed was possessed by devils all his life, then it is impossible to consider how Islam could have been any different.
The only way forward is to tell the divisive Muslim Council Of Britain to officially define Islam as a doctrine of Peace, to re-write the Koran to have it interpreted as peaceful (WH Smith sell that already!) and excommunicate evil Muslims who preach hate and death. Muslims must also swear an oath to the Crown and be officially tried for treason should they be found guilty of terror plotting. This would mean that a controlled British state-sanctioned Islam would be the only legal flavour of Islam in which Muslims could believe. And if moderate Muslims are indeed what they claim, then they would not notice any difference.
In short, as another recent study found, Muslims who are made to toe the line and integrate with a host nation's culture can and do settle peacefully and turn their backs on the bombers.
But it takes a government with guts to get the ball rolling. But as Labour are desperate for the Muslim block-vote (due partly to proper Brits being so thoroughly disgusted with them) and the Tories are Labour wannabes, then it is clear that our troubles will get worse before they improve.
CLARIFICATION: It may appear in the above that I am suggesting a moderation of Islam in the paragraph imediately after the ne in which I said it was impossible!
What I should have made clear is that the intention is to have the State direct Islam and not the other way around.
Such a practice of Sovereign-sanctioned religion does of course have its precedents in British History.
Such a practice would have many benefits, not least in which governments, democratic organisations and Muslim public opinion of the day would shape the moral direction of the religion rather than the printed hear-say based on the diatribe of a brutal dictator the ancient world had the misfortune to experience.
Oh no...I just lost a long comment :(
Yes, Mohammed was a psychopath and his followers have psychopathic traits also....their dealing with and respect for infidels is psychopathic.
I'll be making a video on this subject soon and hope it's ok to use some of your text.
Post a Comment
<< Home